Difference between revisions of "Talk:Charter/Sources/Simple view of ethics and morals"
From Anarchopedia
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Obviously we can't discuss "founding assumptions" or "charters" at all without some common view of morality and ethical behavior... so without | + | Obviously we can't discuss "founding assumptions" or "charters" at all without some common view of morality and ethical behavior... so without an introduction to that, we are going to have more and more chaos. No one should be writing here without at least reading this - this would seem to be the core of any dispute resolution. |
| − | + | [[Larry Sanger]] is extremely clear: ''"It was difficult to claim the moral high ground in a dispute, because the basic project principles were constantly coming under attack." ... "More generally, the very application of rules, or laws, entails a moral judgment"''. So without such a '''simple view''' in common, it would be likely impossible to really settle any editing dispute at all. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [[Larry Sanger]] is extremely clear | + | |
Latest revision as of 19:44, 24 April 2005
Obviously we can't discuss "founding assumptions" or "charters" at all without some common view of morality and ethical behavior... so without an introduction to that, we are going to have more and more chaos. No one should be writing here without at least reading this - this would seem to be the core of any dispute resolution.
Larry Sanger is extremely clear: "It was difficult to claim the moral high ground in a dispute, because the basic project principles were constantly coming under attack." ... "More generally, the very application of rules, or laws, entails a moral judgment". So without such a simple view in common, it would be likely impossible to really settle any editing dispute at all.
