Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(proposal/proposition of consideration about authoritarian articles.)
(We aren't going to delete articles simply because they're written by supporters of Bolshevism.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
*Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
 
*Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
**Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians without that anti-authoritarian's critical be done.
+
**Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted.
 
*Anarchopedia doesn't have a [[en:power structure|power structure]].
 
*Anarchopedia doesn't have a [[en:power structure|power structure]].
**Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people which decide what is right and what is wrong.
+
**Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong.
 
*''...''
 
*''...''
  
 
----
 
----
  
*Anarchopedia is not a leninist or bolchevic wiki.
+
*Anarchopedia is not a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki.
-> then, all articles from bolchevics (and friends) are moved.
+
  
 
... etc, ...
 
... etc, ...
  
 
:I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about [[:deu:]] here. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
 
:I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about [[:deu:]] here. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT)

Revision as of 00:25, 4 May 2005

What Anarchopedia is not is the opposite of Anarchopedia:Itself. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important:

  • Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
    • Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted.
  • Anarchopedia doesn't have a.
    • Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong.
  • ...

  • Anarchopedia is not a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki.

... etc, ...

I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about deu: here. --Milos Rancic 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT)