Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:Purpose"
(Undo revision 26760 by 182.253.49.24 (Talk)) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{langs}} | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | Where it becomes clear that there is substantial resistance to some purpose, this can be reflected in [[Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not|what Anarchopedia is not]], but only after users in conflict have debated it extensively. In other words, neither purpose nor exclusions from purpose should be decided arbitrarily by any one | + | The best way to determine '''Anarchopedia's Purpose''' is to gather what is said about that in its articles on more specific topics. That way, anyone who cares about some goal, principle, or understanding, can say there how it affects or should affect [[Anarchopedia:en:itself|Anarchopedia:itself]]. There are no "special articles" that "only trusted people" can edit. This is exactly how we propose also to evolve [[Anarchopedia:en:policy|Anarchopedia:policy]]. |
| + | |||
| + | Where it becomes clear that there is substantial resistance to some purpose, this can be reflected in [[Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not|what Anarchopedia is not]], but only after users in conflict have debated it extensively. In other words, neither purpose nor exclusions from purpose should be decided arbitrarily by any one "editor". | ||
''See [[Anarchopedia:en:direct democracy|direct democracy]] for how issues are resolved if this bottom-up process needs to be accelerated, e.g. when decisions become urgent.'' | ''See [[Anarchopedia:en:direct democracy|direct democracy]] for how issues are resolved if this bottom-up process needs to be accelerated, e.g. when decisions become urgent.'' | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Anarchopedia documentation]] | [[Category:Anarchopedia documentation]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:58, 27 January 2014
العربية | Bahasa Indonesia | Bosanski | ä¸æ–‡ | Dansk | Deutsch | עברית | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Esperanto | Français | Hrvatski | Italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | Nynorsk | Polski | Português | Română | РуÑÑкий | СрпÑки / Srpski | Svenska
The best way to determine Anarchopedia's Purpose is to gather what is said about that in its articles on more specific topics. That way, anyone who cares about some goal, principle, or understanding, can say there how it affects or should affect Anarchopedia:itself. There are no "special articles" that "only trusted people" can edit. This is exactly how we propose also to evolve Anarchopedia:policy.
Where it becomes clear that there is substantial resistance to some purpose, this can be reflected in what Anarchopedia is not, but only after users in conflict have debated it extensively. In other words, neither purpose nor exclusions from purpose should be decided arbitrarily by any one "editor".
See direct democracy for how issues are resolved if this bottom-up process needs to be accelerated, e.g. when decisions become urgent.
