|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | An internet discussion forum is considered '''troll-friendly''' if it does not take steps to discourage [[trolling]]. Troll-friendly policies include:
| |
| − | *not banning or moderating accused [[trolls]],
| |
| − | *not preventing the forum being accessed from [[open proxy|open proxies]],
| |
| − | *allowing [[anonymous post]]ing or allowing easy creation of new accounts,
| |
| − | *not permitting deletions of materials based solely on accusation of authorship
| |
| − | Being troll-friendly implies also controls on the [[sysop power structure]] such as to prevent or restrict any [[sysop]] acting alone from:
| |
| − | *redefining trolling as [[vandalism]] arbitrarily
| |
| − | *selecting its own political labels on controversial topics
| |
| − | *subverting [[due process]] for any cases of [[outing]] or [[alleged and collective identity]] confusion, in particular, banning all "user X is user Y" class of comments as irrelevant or biasing
| |
| | | | |
| − | Because controversies on these issues are common, usage of this phrase has also become very common:
| |
| − | *"We also have troll friendly proxies," - [http://brawl-hall.com/pages/index2.php brawl-hall.com]
| |
| − | *"VT is definitely a troll-friendly environment, but I make a habit
| |
| − | of using the report option when they get too far out of line." - [http://www.funmac.com/showthread.php?t=6971 re: VersionTracker]
| |
| − | *" Fanhome is a Troll friendly environment. ... Yet here you are. Like I said,
| |
| − | Fanhome is Troll-friendly." - [http://mb3.theinsiders.com/fvancouvercanucksfrm1.showMessageRange?topicID=2963.topic&start=21&stop=31 Vancouver Canucks "FanHome" site]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Some services say as explicit matter of policy that they are '''not troll-friendly'''. For instance, [[Wikipedia]] goes on [[wiki witchhunt]]s against presumed trolls who question its [[sysop power structure]]. The term troll-friendly is quite common:
| |
| − | *"We are not Troll friendly. Postings that have been placed on the boards to disrupt the flow of conversation will be removed..." - [http://www.cruise-addicts.com/forumguide.html CruiseAddicts.com forum guidelines]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === '''troll-friendly''' [[politics as usual]] ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Troll-friendly [[wiki management]] [[Wiki best practices|practices]] are designed to accomodate the [[New Troll point of view]] as much as possible. Rather than attempting to classify, categorize, restrict and challenge what [[trolls]] do, it attempts instead to engage them using [[political virtues]]:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | *prudence,
| |
| − | *conciliation,
| |
| − | *compromise,
| |
| − | *variety,
| |
| − | *adaptability, and
| |
| − | *liveliness.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | These democratic values were listed by [[Bernard Crick]] as alternatives to [[ideology]] or any "absolute-sounding [[ethic]]".
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Very tellingly, [[w:political virtues|the article that is supposed to explain this is a mere stub]] at [[Wikipedia]]. This will not surprise anyone familiar with their [[GodKing]] or [[sysop power structure]], which lacks very considerably in these virtues.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === trolling, trusting, process and forgiving ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Any '''[[troll]]-friendly''' [[system]] or [[social software]]-based service assumes that [[built trust]] is very low, [[found trust]] is very high. It further assumes that [[grown trust]] will not happen unless a degree of [[politics as usual]] is allowed to apply in that system. ''This seems to be one motivation for proposing explicit [[faction]] support.''
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The main motive for troll-friendly policy is that consensus has to form on the basis of strict [[due process]]. Low-integrity editors must be "driven off":
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[Trolls]] believe that when someone has actively participated in building a [[sysop power structure]] that engages in [[ad hominem revert]], [[ad hominem delete]], [[witch-hunt]], [[inquisitor]], [[psychiatry]], [[libel]] and [[echo chamber]] tactics, under the same identity, they ''should'' be ''actively'' [[driven off by trolls]], and good riddance. If they wish this not to happen, they should make a new identity, and change their behaviour under the old one on any [[large public wiki]] where they are known for this inexcusable [[sysop vandalism]] - probably also giving up any position in the [[sysop power structure]] as well.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | If they do all this and become an advocate for true [[soft security]] at least in cases other than [[simple vandalism]], and become widely known for changing their spots, at that point, [[trolls]] usually say it is the obligation of any '''troll-friendly''' wiki to not only accept them back, but honour their conversion to the ways of trolls...
| |
| − |
| |
| − | === Implications for Anarchopedia ===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For Anarchopedia, this means [[sysop]]s should not push their luck or assume they are in charge of every [[faction]] or can resolve [[political dispute]] when people devote their lives to that in the real world and fail. In the long term it means that the [[Anarchopedia:Social club]] shouldn't over-ride [[consensus]] rules.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == References ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Adapted from [[Consumerium]] article, "Troll-friendly", http://develop.consumerium.org/wiki/index.php/Troll-friendly used under the GNU Free Documentation License
| |
