|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{:Charter/Nav}}
| + | Hello my friend heres my new gig easy as it looks Ill send u a total of 5350++ backlinks to your website in 2 tiers. This gig its for 1 website and up to 5 keywords. First tier to your main website 350 page rank 1-5 and the the second tier of 5000 profile backlinks pointing to your first tier.Ill send u a report in a txt file in less than 48 hours.Any question just send me a private message |
| − | We are here met for a political object, and discussion involves political terms, many of which may be unfamiliar to those with predominantly technical backgrounds.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Politics is a complex subject and an old one, and much has been written about its practice and the establishment of political communities. Perhaps some good general sources should be listed here.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | The topic of emergent politics and large group dynamics within online communities is a new one; it is only recently that any online community or and [[eng:group entity]] grew big enough, long enough, to display these dynamics.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Glossary ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Here's a quick glossary of [[political terms]]. Anyone with the willingness might work to link these to Wiktionary or other good sources.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | ; '''politics''', or '''politics as usual''' : "the art of the possible"; how humans organize their communities
| + | |
| − | ; '''convention''' : assembly of individuals who meet to establish a charter or other foundation issues; tends to be very large
| + | |
| − | ; '''party''' : group within a convention who are agreed on a platform and work together to advance it; usually a large fraction of convention members
| + | |
| − | ; '''[[Charter/What is a caucus|caucus]]''' : group within a convention who seek to find a common ground on some issues; often quite small
| + | |
| − | ; '''platform''' : political agenda or plan of action
| + | |
| − | ; '''plank''' : element, section, or clause of a platform
| + | |
| − | ; '''charter''' : foundation document which controls all other documents, rules, and procedures governing a [[eng:group entity]]; sometimes ''constitution''
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == External links ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | As time and energy permit, please pull this material out and put it on distinct subpages of [[Charter/Sources]]/.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reputation_management Reputation management]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html Shirky:A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/19/1432218&from=rss Slashdot-Wikipedia Reaches Half a Million Articles]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2004/12/30/142458/25 Why Wikipedia Must Jettison Its Anti-Elitism] by Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger,
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2004/12/06/Trustipedia ''...it may be the case that we have to figure out how to make the Wikipedia good, because that’s all there’s going to be.'' (death of the paper encyclopedia)]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.corante.com/many/archives/2004/08/29/wikipedia_reputation_and_the_wemedia_project.php ''Introducing reputation for contributors or articles is the greatest risk to the Wikipedia community.'']
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.fullcirc.com/weblog/2005/02/emergent-or-structured-reputation.htm Jimbo Wales at Stanford, February 2005]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Article_validation Metawiki:Article validation]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://ross.typepad.com/blog/2004/01/phantom_authori.html ''...to scale further a reputation system may be required for this network...'']
| + | |
| − | ** [http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_12/ciffolilli/#c3 (First Monday) Phantom Authority]
| + | |
| − | ** [http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue9_7/masum/ (First Monday) Manifesto for the Reputation Society]
| + | |
| − | ** [[meatball:GetARoom]], [[meatball:ConflictParadox]], [[meatball:CommunitySolution]], [[meatball:RewardReputation]] vs. [[meatball:DissuadeReputation]]
| + | |
| − | * [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/10/arts/10wiki.html Mudslinging Weasels into Online History -- Written by committee, political entries get nasty], [http://www.dynamist.com/weblog/archives/001410.html Wiki Wars] and [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=Living_Platform LivingPlatform.CA] vs. [http://www.wikinfo.org/wiki.php?title=Green_Party_of_Canada_Living_Platform GPC-LP] - some [[case study|case studies]] of actual [[politics as usual]] becoming tied up with [[wiki politics]]. Worth detailed review, and suggesting a need for a [[polity]] to start to deal with inherent political differences AS such.
| + | |
| − | * The Early History of Nupedia and Wikipedia - [http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/18/164213 Part I], [http://features.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/04/19/1746205 Part II] by co-founder [[Larry Sanger]] - Quotes: ''""Force of personality" might be enough to make a small group of people hang together; for better or worse, however, clearly enunciated rules are needed to make larger groups of people hang together."'' - ''"Indeed, consider making a project '''charter''' to make it clear from the beginning what the basic principles governing the project will be."''
| + | |
Hello my friend heres my new gig easy as it looks Ill send u a total of 5350++ backlinks to your website in 2 tiers. This gig its for 1 website and up to 5 keywords. First tier to your main website 350 page rank 1-5 and the the second tier of 5000 profile backlinks pointing to your first tier.Ill send u a report in a txt file in less than 48 hours.Any question just send me a private message
