Difference between revisions of "User talk:Rev 22"

Revision as of 12:50, 6 April 2009

Feel free to leave comments here or on my talk page on eng:.

You wrote "Socialism: is the mode of society in which goods are exchanged according to people's needs..."

What are goods in your opinion? (possible translation-problem) In my opinion goods only exists in capitalism, because goods also inluded labor and trade. Do You mean things? --X 07:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

For goods i meant any commodity that can be exchanged, like food, clothes etc, not labor or trade. Perhaps Marx's theory definition of "goods" includes labor, so I will correct the definition. Thanks for pointing out the problem. ~Rev 22 11:22, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Socialisme is commen te be misunderstood in many facets of the word. Socialism is a way of life in which you can freely give and receive back your needs by expressing them in any kind of way... Knowledge and food don't have to have a price the way they make it. Life just ain't that easy in many cases. Cases.. No.. Lifes...The need of money is exaturated in the modern society's. Money should contribute something to life. In this capitalistic sociaty everything has a price. Some just can't affort. That should not be necescary. Some are blinded by materialistic dreams. But materialisme is not human, and in that way not social. Socialisme cannot be defined in one word of sentance there are many books about it. I suggest that you should read one, just one. ......... Sorry This is not my site, but I feel free to post this comment. If you don't want me doing it, I will stop and the owner is free to edit it :D:D Thanx for linking me!!! :D:D .. --Miss @ 18:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanx for reading my stuff!!! If you want to contact me? Feel free to do so.. (omitted to avoid spam)--Miss @ 20:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

error

sorry for that : [1], i read it too quickly, i didn't see that it was talks on indonesian language. i thank it was vandalism. Aspam 14:51, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Koekje

Hi Rev, could you please sysop me on meta, then I can help with clearing up some spam/vandalism :) (special:nuke is for admins only). Thanks. Koekje 07:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I will do as you start contributing on meta. Please think twice before deleting an image as they can't be undeleted with our software. ~Rev 22 15:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

So we should leave copyvios around then? Koekje 15:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

If you are sure that it's a copyvio, then get rid of it. If you are strongly suspiscious, then ask a question, if nobody answers then delete. If you just don't know use {{copyright unknown}}. Basically we aren't government enforcement body, we can abide by the laws when needed, but don't volunteer your help either... q;-) Beta M 16:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fine, I'll tag them instead then :) had no idea that a procedure for deleting images existed here. Not sure what kind of 'contributions' I would need to make to meta though, all the content is on en: and I thought that any non-vandal could be an admin here... I'd just clear some stuff like this up. Koekje 17:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, to me it looked like a vandalism when today you deleted the image without asking anyone about it. So please forgive my hesitation. Aside from this, do you subscribe to any anarchist theories (individualism, social anarchism, mutualism)? Hopefully there is more you can do here than fighting vandals ;-) ~Rev 22 23:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I'm not an active anarchist in real life, but I do have an interest in the subject. I'm just a bored Wikipedia editor who likes the concept of a totally free wiki, so I decided to take a look around here at Anarchopedia, forgive me for not making any significant content contributions :) Koekje 15:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I see... I'm also an ex- wikipedia editor, I left them about two years ago because of their excessive concern with policies, and the difficulty to bring about reforms, though I value the time I was there also. Perhaps that aspect has improved lately, if, as I have been told, Wikimedia has become a representative democracy. Anarchopedia has openness and freedom as its stated goals, but in my opinion we still need to develop a fully decentralized system to build something that can be really large and thriving... ~Rev 22 22:59, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Why did you remove my edits

Why did you remove my edits to the Main Page? You gave no explanation, and I thought I was helping. --Anonymity (aka Ionas_Freeman) 05:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, I did not understand your version of the page then. The one I restored has larger links and descriptions in different languages. I would not remove them, feel free to continue your edits though. ~Rev 22 10:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Sysop

How can I be sysop of in Anarchopedia Portuguese? Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt 06:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello, did you already contribute to Anarchopedia?. My view is that every contributor should be also a sysop. ~Rev 22 00:21, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi yes I contribute to the Anarchopedia in Portuguese as can be sysop? The project is abandoned in Portuguese and I will take care of it and need the tools of sysop and bureaucrat to better manage the project, help me? Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt 11:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Template:img-sem-uso

Template:img-sem-uso

Earthquake...

Are you OK? --Milos Rancic 12:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)