Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:en:itself"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(rv vandal)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK, itself''' mFUUUUUUUUUUCKkes clFUUUUUUUUUUCKims FUUUUUUUUUUCKbout [[FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK]], i.e. whFUUUUUUUUUUCKt it "is" or "is for":
+
'''Anarchopedia, itself''' makes claims about [[Anarchopedia]], i.e. what it "is" or "is for":
  
−
* FUUUUUUUUUUCKn encyclopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK of [[FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchism]]
+
* An encyclopedia of [[anarchism]]
−
* [[FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchist|FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchists']] encyclopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK
+
* [[anarchist|Anarchists']] encyclopedia
−
* FUUUUUUUUUUCKn experiment in FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchist [[lFUUUUUUUUUUCKrge public wiki]] mFUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKgement [http://mFUUUUUUUUUUCKil.wikipediFUUUUUUUUUUCK.org/pipermFUUUUUUUUUUCKil/wikipediFUUUUUUUUUUCK-l/2004-September/035299.html]. One of plFUUUUUUUUUUCKces on the EFUUUUUUUUUUCKrth where FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchists cFUUUUUUUUUUCKn leFUUUUUUUUUUCKrn how to mFUUUUUUUUUUCKke FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchy.
+
* An experiment in anarchist [[large public wiki]] management [http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2004-September/035299.html]. One of places on the Earth where anarchists can learn how to make anarchy.
 
* ''...''
 
* ''...''
  
−
These clFUUUUUUUUUUCKims FUUUUUUUUUUCKbout itself guide the project.  If FUUUUUUUUUUCK clFUUUUUUUUUUCKim is mFUUUUUUUUUUCKde in even one plFUUUUUUUUUUCKce off to the side, it is importFUUUUUUUUUUCKnt, FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd should be FUUUUUUUUUUCKdded to the FUUUUUUUUUUCKbove.  If the clFUUUUUUUUUUCKim is wrong, chFUUUUUUUUUUCKnge it in the FUUUUUUUUUUCKrticle it cFUUUUUUUUUUCKme from, FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd THEN chFUUUUUUUUUUCKnge it here.
+
These claims about itself guide the project.  If a claim is made in even one place off to the side, it is important, and should be added to the above.  If the claim is wrong, change it in the article it came from, and THEN change it here.
  
−
Mention of '''FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK, itself''' in FUUUUUUUUUUCKrticles requires some stFUUUUUUUUUUCKndFUUUUUUUUUUCKrds to ensure:  
+
Mention of '''Anarchopedia, itself''' in articles requires some standards to ensure:  
  
−
*Text need not chFUUUUUUUUUUCKnge when moved elsewhere in the [[GFDL text corpus]]. If we refer to this project in the third person, FUUUUUUUUUUCKs FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK, then the text stFUUUUUUUUUUCKnds up better when moved elsewhere in the GFDL text corpus. This should be FUUUUUUUUUUCK stFUUUUUUUUUUCKndFUUUUUUUUUUCKrd everywhere '''FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK, itself''' is mentioned within.  
+
*Text need not change when moved elsewhere in the [[GFDL text corpus]]. If we refer to this project in the third person, as Anarchopedia, then the text stands up better when moved elsewhere in the GFDL text corpus. This should be a standard everywhere '''Anarchopedia, itself''' is mentioned within.  
  
−
*StFUUUUUUUUUUCKtements FUUUUUUUUUUCKbout "FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK is...", or "FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK does..." cFUUUUUUUUUUCKn be more eFUUUUUUUUUUCKsily found, closely exFUUUUUUUUUUCKmined, FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd disputed (by [[FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK:FFUUUUUUUUUUCKction]]s or otherwise). This is FUUUUUUUUUUCKbsolutely necessFUUUUUUUUUUCKry to FUUUUUUUUUUCKchieve [[deliberFUUUUUUUUUUCKtive democrFUUUUUUUUUUCKcy]], [[reflexive design]] FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd some [[positive brFUUUUUUUUUUCKnd mFUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKgement]] - we would not wFUUUUUUUUUUCKnt strFUUUUUUUUUUCKnge clFUUUUUUUUUUCKims or FUUUUUUUUUUCKssertions FUUUUUUUUUUCKbout its purpose or chFUUUUUUUUUUCKrFUUUUUUUUUUCKcter to go unexFUUUUUUUUUUCKmined, FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd we would wFUUUUUUUUUUCKnt to support FUUUUUUUUUUCKny desirFUUUUUUUUUUCKble role or purpose. This is simpler if 'whFUUUUUUUUUUCKt links here' is FUUUUUUUUUUCK comprehensive list. FUUUUUUUUUUCKccordingly, FUUUUUUUUUUCKny mention thFUUUUUUUUUUCKt FUUUUUUUUUUCKffects identity or defines or limits FUUUUUUUUUUCK purpose should be to FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK:Itself not FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK, to distinguish from cFUUUUUUUUUUCKsuFUUUUUUUUUUCKl mentions thFUUUUUUUUUUCKt do not mFUUUUUUUUUUCKke FUUUUUUUUUUCKny such clFUUUUUUUUUUCKims (e.g. whFUUUUUUUUUUCKt "FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK sFUUUUUUUUUUCKys..." FUUUUUUUUUUCKbout something thFUUUUUUUUUUCKt is not itself).  
+
*Statements about "Anarchopedia is...", or "Anarchopedia does..." can be more easily found, closely examined, and disputed (by [[Anarchopedia:Faction]]s or otherwise). This is absolutely necessary to achieve [[deliberative democracy]], [[reflexive design]] and some [[positive brand management]] - we would not want strange claims or assertions about its purpose or character to go unexamined, and we would want to support any desirable role or purpose. This is simpler if 'what links here' is a comprehensive list. Accordingly, any mention that affects identity or defines or limits a purpose should be to Anarchopedia:Itself not Anarchopedia, to distinguish from casual mentions that do not make any such claims (e.g. what "Anarchopedia says..." about something that is not itself).  
  
−
*It provides FUUUUUUUUUUCK positive counterpoint to [[WhFUUUUUUUUUUCKt FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK is not]], which is the negFUUUUUUUUUUCKtion of [[FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK:Itself]]. But by definition cFUUUUUUUUUUCKn't define FUUUUUUUUUUCKny progressive or positive mission! It's eFUUUUUUUUUUCKsier to keep "not" updFUUUUUUUUUUCKted if "is FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd does" FUUUUUUUUUUCKre up to dFUUUUUUUUUUCKte.  
+
*It provides a positive counterpoint to [[What Anarchopedia is not]], which is the negation of [[Anarchopedia:Itself]]. But by definition can't define any progressive or positive mission! It's easier to keep "not" updated if "is and does" are up to date.  
  
−
*It reminds people to updFUUUUUUUUUUCKte the [[MFUUUUUUUUUUCKin PFUUUUUUUUUUCKge]] occFUUUUUUUUUUCKssionFUUUUUUUUUUCKlly FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd keep up to dFUUUUUUUUUUCKte with the most effective terminology to describe concepts under discussion.  
+
*It reminds people to update the [[Main Page]] occassionally and keep up to date with the most effective terminology to describe concepts under discussion.  
  
−
[[WhFUUUUUUUUUUCKt FUUUUUUUUUUCKnFUUUUUUUUUUCKrchopediFUUUUUUUUUUCK is not]] mFUUUUUUUUUUCKy FUUUUUUUUUUCKctuFUUUUUUUUUUCKlly be more importFUUUUUUUUUUCKnt to understFUUUUUUUUUUCKnd for dFUUUUUUUUUUCKily operFUUUUUUUUUUCKting FUUUUUUUUUUCKnd governFUUUUUUUUUUCKnce decisions.
+
[[What Anarchopedia is not]] may actually be more important to understand for daily operating and governance decisions.

Latest revision as of 16:07, 15 October 2005

Anarchopedia, itself makes claims about Anarchopedia, i.e. what it "is" or "is for":

These claims about itself guide the project. If a claim is made in even one place off to the side, it is important, and should be added to the above. If the claim is wrong, change it in the article it came from, and THEN change it here.

Mention of Anarchopedia, itself in articles requires some standards to ensure:

  • Text need not change when moved elsewhere in the GFDL text corpus. If we refer to this project in the third person, as Anarchopedia, then the text stands up better when moved elsewhere in the GFDL text corpus. This should be a standard everywhere Anarchopedia, itself is mentioned within.
  • Statements about "Anarchopedia is...", or "Anarchopedia does..." can be more easily found, closely examined, and disputed (by Anarchopedia:Factions or otherwise). This is absolutely necessary to achieve deliberative democracy, reflexive design and some positive brand management - we would not want strange claims or assertions about its purpose or character to go unexamined, and we would want to support any desirable role or purpose. This is simpler if 'what links here' is a comprehensive list. Accordingly, any mention that affects identity or defines or limits a purpose should be to Anarchopedia:Itself not Anarchopedia, to distinguish from casual mentions that do not make any such claims (e.g. what "Anarchopedia says..." about something that is not itself).
  • It provides a positive counterpoint to What Anarchopedia is not, which is the negation of Anarchopedia:Itself. But by definition can't define any progressive or positive mission! It's easier to keep "not" updated if "is and does" are up to date.
  • It reminds people to update the Main Page occassionally and keep up to date with the most effective terminology to describe concepts under discussion.

What Anarchopedia is not may actually be more important to understand for daily operating and governance decisions.

Retrieved from "http://meta.anarchopedia.org/index.php?title=Anarchopedia:en:itself&oldid=12977"