Difference between revisions of "Charter/Preamble"
m (Reverted edits by 210.22.158.132 (Talk); changed back to last version by Beta M) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{:Charter/Nav}} | {{:Charter/Nav}} | ||
| − | + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | |
Wikipedia is ''not'' one big happy family. Wikipedia ''was'' one big happy family -- oh, yeah, some ruffhousing now and then, but not what it is now. Wikipedia is no longer even a small town. We do ''not'' know everyone we meet. Wikipedia is a small ''city'', and still growing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3AStatistics]. We now spend more time and energy dealing with growing pains than with useful content, and this imbalance is getting ''worse''. | Wikipedia is ''not'' one big happy family. Wikipedia ''was'' one big happy family -- oh, yeah, some ruffhousing now and then, but not what it is now. Wikipedia is no longer even a small town. We do ''not'' know everyone we meet. Wikipedia is a small ''city'', and still growing [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special%3AStatistics]. We now spend more time and energy dealing with growing pains than with useful content, and this imbalance is getting ''worse''. | ||
| − | + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | |
The Wikipedian Community began with ideals -- noble ideals, excellent ideals. But some of these ideals are demanding for ''any'' large community. '''Good outweighs bad''' in the absence of structure ''only'' as long as the good are able to ''watch'' the bad. We can no longer resist the need to make '''some''' basic changes to our most cherished beliefs. We have many choices in how we do this, but no choice at all in whether we can retain, unchanged, what we had before. '''''We cannot.''''' | The Wikipedian Community began with ideals -- noble ideals, excellent ideals. But some of these ideals are demanding for ''any'' large community. '''Good outweighs bad''' in the absence of structure ''only'' as long as the good are able to ''watch'' the bad. We can no longer resist the need to make '''some''' basic changes to our most cherished beliefs. We have many choices in how we do this, but no choice at all in whether we can retain, unchanged, what we had before. '''''We cannot.''''' | ||
| − | + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | |
If we resist change, then social forces will ''destroy'' our ideals in fact, even as they continue to give them lip service. If we '''abandon our duty''' to craft the future, it will be crafted for us by others. | If we resist change, then social forces will ''destroy'' our ideals in fact, even as they continue to give them lip service. If we '''abandon our duty''' to craft the future, it will be crafted for us by others. | ||
| − | + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | |
Besides our social problems, we also find ourselves beset by technical difficulties. These are relatively minor, but are related to our social problems, and must also be addressed. | Besides our social problems, we also find ourselves beset by technical difficulties. These are relatively minor, but are related to our social problems, and must also be addressed. | ||
| − | + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | |
We cannot alter human nature without limit. We cannot engineer human group dynamics as easily as server networks. We must take into account immutable human nature, choose our direction for the future, and embrace it. | We cannot alter human nature without limit. We cannot engineer human group dynamics as easily as server networks. We must take into account immutable human nature, choose our direction for the future, and embrace it. | ||
| + | [[Image:fat Geek.jpg]] | ||
Revision as of 13:52, 24 March 2008
File:fat Geek.jpg Wikipedia is not one big happy family. Wikipedia was one big happy family -- oh, yeah, some ruffhousing now and then, but not what it is now. Wikipedia is no longer even a small town. We do not know everyone we meet. Wikipedia is a small city, and still growing [1]. We now spend more time and energy dealing with growing pains than with useful content, and this imbalance is getting worse. File:fat Geek.jpg The Wikipedian Community began with ideals -- noble ideals, excellent ideals. But some of these ideals are demanding for any large community. Good outweighs bad in the absence of structure only as long as the good are able to watch the bad. We can no longer resist the need to make some basic changes to our most cherished beliefs. We have many choices in how we do this, but no choice at all in whether we can retain, unchanged, what we had before. We cannot. File:fat Geek.jpg If we resist change, then social forces will destroy our ideals in fact, even as they continue to give them lip service. If we abandon our duty to craft the future, it will be crafted for us by others. File:fat Geek.jpg Besides our social problems, we also find ourselves beset by technical difficulties. These are relatively minor, but are related to our social problems, and must also be addressed. File:fat Geek.jpg We cannot alter human nature without limit. We cannot engineer human group dynamics as easily as server networks. We must take into account immutable human nature, choose our direction for the future, and embrace it. File:fat Geek.jpg
