Difference between revisions of "User talk:XXPowerMexicoXx"
(→concerning the child porn freak) |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== concerning the child porn freak == | == concerning the child porn freak == | ||
I don`t want his crap on my user page, I answered in the discussion page of the article where I also copied his stuff. I think my deletion of his article is valid. Feel free to post your obligations there if you have any. Thanks. [[User:Krähe|Krähe]] | I don`t want his crap on my user page, I answered in the discussion page of the article where I also copied his stuff. I think my deletion of his article is valid. Feel free to post your obligations there if you have any. Thanks. [[User:Krähe|Krähe]] | ||
+ | :Oh, sorry, since you werent logged in I thought the blanking was IP vandalism.. --[[User:XXPowerMexicoXx|XXPowerMexicoXx]] 01:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:50, 23 May 2011
Warning:You are currently at meta:
Well, hello too, and you do so much good stuff here I was surprised to see you only recently create a User page. I assumed you were a regular. Anarchangel 02:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Unblock request
it seems you are not blocked. Libre 21:51, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Block rights
Try now, I think it should work. (BTW, I was wondering why you are not blocking spammers :) ) Be careful, as there are legitimate users around. I blocked at least once a legitimate user (but unblocked, of course). --Milos Rancic 20:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
About spam
I've managed to do something. However, blocking IPs should still be done, but it shouldn't be necessary to be very prompt. I'll add in a couple of days massive IP blocks of open proxies. I'll let you know when I finish that. --Milos Rancic 22:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Good, btw what do you mean by 'prompt'? sorry --189.191.103.53 00:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Until they change strategy, I don't expect a lot of spam anymore. So, creation of new user doesn't imply immediate spam. --Milos Rancic 00:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
concerning the child porn freak
I don`t want his crap on my user page, I answered in the discussion page of the article where I also copied his stuff. I think my deletion of his article is valid. Feel free to post your obligations there if you have any. Thanks. Krähe
- Oh, sorry, since you werent logged in I thought the blanking was IP vandalism.. --XXPowerMexicoXx 01:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)