Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why do You discard the comment, Libre?)
m (it's ok... he moved my comment where it should be: at the talk page)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
*Anarchopedia doesn't have a [[en:power structure|power structure]].
 
*Anarchopedia doesn't have a [[en:power structure|power structure]].
 
**Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong.
 
**Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong.
*''...''
 
 
----
 
 
 
*Anarchopedia is not a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki.
 
*Anarchopedia is not a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki.
 
+
*''...''
... etc, ...
+
 
+
:I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about [[:deu:]] here. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
+

Revision as of 22:02, 4 May 2005

What Anarchopedia is not is the opposite of Anarchopedia:Itself. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important:

  • Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
    • Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted.
  • Anarchopedia doesn't have a.
    • Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong.
  • Anarchopedia is not a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki.
  • ...