Talk:Anarchopedia

Criticism

"There are only two "explicit rules" here:"

1. "Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist POVs are not welcome here."
   • This is because in an ideal society, Right-wing speech (ie. speech advocating, for instance, the use of force against tyrants, lower taxes, etc.), is banned.

     I think this point needs clarification. The fact that some ideologies are not welcome doesn't mean that their views will be censored, it simply means (in my interpretation) that these views cannot be portrayed as "neutral" or "NPOV" like Wikipedia often does. The faction system can be used to allow articles with points of view that would not be normally accepted by anarchists. Rev 22 21:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

2. "Anarchopedia does not have sysops (i.e. a power structure). All users have sysop permissions."
   • Ignore, for a moment, the fact that on Wiki, by contrast, anyone can post, even non-users. Also neglect the "protect" tab at the top of the page.

     Now users can contribute again without having to register a username. The "protect" feature is inherited from the Mediawiki software. On Anarchopedia this feature has been occasionally used to impede vandalism from spam bots, not to impede editors (who would be expected know how to unprotect a page). Rev 22 21:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

translation to look back.

i translated the french article from AP, maybe there's some points to add... eg: about the similar project (danish and polish or others). Libre 21:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

---

Hello, I created a revision of this article, User:Rev_22/Anarchopedia, but I think many of the changes reflect my views so I would like other opinions before I attempt to merge it to this article. ~Rev 22 10:36, 12 August 2006 (UTC)