User:Anonymity
I am a user on English Wikipedia, albeït not with the same Username. I prefer to remain anonymous, and one can question my anonymity by E-Mail. If one chooses to question the reason why I have chosen anonymity, they will promise not to tell my real-life identity due to my suspicion of future real-life harassment. I would like to contribute here. Sincerely,
AnonymityT 04:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Short biography
I am a middle school user from the United States of America, and am interested in how anarchism can be developed with technological innovations such as the Free software movement and virtual communities noline. I believe that prison is just a politically correct way of saying "torture", disguised as punishment so people would just think it's some good thing to make them ponder (notice not "give them a chance to ponder") their past actions. Behind a metal cell. They are unhealthy behind there.
The free software movement is composed of very heroic people who have found a way to liberate people from the pressures of statism. They have done everything to make our lives free and stop "private property" from talking over. The free software symbolises liberation from hierarchy and unnecessary laws imposed by the state on the world, and that is admirable.
I consider it necessary that the antistatist revolution be nonviolent, since violence just shows that you are acting like what you hate, established government. It is hypocritical in that regimes such as Stalin's, Hitler's, and Mussolini's used violent tactics, and to "give them a taste of their own medicine" is just what religion is all about. Hence I insist that violence not be used in the anarchic revolution, because it is counterproductive and does not help.
However, let this not imply that I am promoting pacifism, nor am I a pacifist. I also defend the actions of violent anarchists (except people who use bombs on factory farms, ELF, and the like. They really are terrorists.) because I assume ignorance with them and that is not a crime.
Wikipedia
I would like to reform Wikipedia into an anarchic community where everyone is equal. The dictatorship run by Jimmy Wales is not only unethical (it is leading naive people into joining a "free encyclopedia" whereas it is a "role-playing game" where strict rules apply to everyone but "administrators" who are supposed to be infallible) and wrong, but alsoo ineffective (the more people realise, the more people will just give up). I would like to change that, however Wikipedians just blocked me anyway for half a year. I am coming pretty close to quitting there.
