Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not"
From Anarchopedia
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project. | *Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project. | ||
**Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted. | **Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted. | ||
| − | *Anarchopedia | + | *Anarchopedia does have a [[en:power structure|power structure]] otherwise there wouldn't be sysops. |
| − | **Anarchopedia | + | **Anarchopedia doest have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong otherwise there wouldn't be sysops. |
| − | *Anarchopedia | + | *Anarchopedia wouldn't be a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki if there weren't sysops deciding what is right and what is wrong and constituting a power structure. |
| − | * | + | *Lenin's pet squirrel is not censored. |
*''...'' | *''...'' | ||
Revision as of 05:07, 4 April 2006
What Anarchopedia is not is the opposite of Anarchopedia:Itself. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important:
- Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
- Anarchopedia doesn't accept/create articles about authoritarians unless anti-authoritarians' criticism is also accepted.
- Anarchopedia does have a otherwise there wouldn't be sysops.
- Anarchopedia doest have a small group of people that decides what is right and what is wrong otherwise there wouldn't be sysops.
- Anarchopedia wouldn't be a Leninist or Bolshevik wiki if there weren't sysops deciding what is right and what is wrong and constituting a power structure.
- Lenin's pet squirrel is not censored.
- ...
