Difference between revisions of "Charter/General"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(please log in and use tildes)
(no, not a mailing list, i think; no proposals now, either)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why not just post to the wikipedia-l or foundation-l mailing
+
::Why not just post to the wikipedia-l or foundation-l mailing list with your proposals? (68.51.240.131 /  21:48, 14 Apr 2005)
list with your proposals? (68.51.240.131 /  21:48, 14 Apr 2005)
+
  
 
''Please'' login and sign with tildes; you wouldn't be here if you weren't an experienced Wikipedian, so I don't think I need to tell you ''why''. In a face caucus, people do not normally identify themselves; they just walk up and join in, or stand around with their hands in their pockets waiting to hear something interesting. But in wikispace, unless you provide a handle, you not only have no name -- you have no face. [[User:Xiong|&mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]][[Special:Emailuser/Xiong|<font color="#997749">&#29066;</font>]][[User talk:Xiong|talk]]]] 15:53, 15 Apr 2005 (CDT)
 
''Please'' login and sign with tildes; you wouldn't be here if you weren't an experienced Wikipedian, so I don't think I need to tell you ''why''. In a face caucus, people do not normally identify themselves; they just walk up and join in, or stand around with their hands in their pockets waiting to hear something interesting. But in wikispace, unless you provide a handle, you not only have no name -- you have no face. [[User:Xiong|&mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]][[Special:Emailuser/Xiong|<font color="#997749">&#29066;</font>]][[User talk:Xiong|talk]]]] 15:53, 15 Apr 2005 (CDT)
 +
 +
 +
At first, I ''did'' create a mailing list for caucus; but that model is insufficiently open. '''A mailing list has an owner''', with extraordinary power over the list. Also, each text is passed once only to all members, then forgotten -- texts cannot be ''edited''.
 +
 +
I'm not "the boss" here; think of me as the guy who walked into the room first, turned on the lights, and set out the chairs. '''I have no control over the discussion.'''
 +
 +
The wiki model is not only far superior ''in general'' but I think it is clearly superior for the purpose of discussing Wikipedia-related issues. Using a wiki is like having a whiteboard in the room.
 +
 +
I'm not sure what you mean by ''my proposals''. I have ideas, true, but this caucus is not here to push them. I ''have'' made several commonsense assertions; question them if you like:
 +
 +
1. The Wikipedian Community is in a state of crisis.
 +
 +
2. The community at large has reacted to this crisis with multiple calls for a general Convention. Given the technical nature of wikispace, the community is thus ''already'' in convention.
 +
 +
3. Draft charters are visible on many pages of Wikipediaspace.
 +
 +
4. The size of the general membership is so great that political models appropriate to large groups apply.
 +
 +
5. Political business is not transacted on the open floor of a convention. Viable proposals ''only'' come out of caucus -- or are railroaded through by a single powerful faction. 
 +
 +
By the way, ''this'' is not the only caucus! Other Wikipedians are caucusing ''right now.'' I don't know where, and I don't know who -- but I guarantee there are many rooms in cyberspace in which the topic of a Charter or Constitution for the Wikipedian Community is in the air.
 +
 +
Much worse, '''established factions''' are planning to advance their positions without listening to ''any opposition''. I would like to see something of strength arise to oppose the One-Thing People. [[User:Xiong|&mdash; [[User:Xiong|Xiong]][[Special:Emailuser/Xiong|<font color="#997749">&#29066;</font>]][[User talk:Xiong|talk]]]] 16:14, 15 Apr 2005 (CDT)

Revision as of 21:14, 15 April 2005

Why not just post to the wikipedia-l or foundation-l mailing list with your proposals? (68.51.240.131 / 21:48, 14 Apr 2005)

Please login and sign with tildes; you wouldn't be here if you weren't an experienced Wikipedian, so I don't think I need to tell you why. In a face caucus, people do not normally identify themselves; they just walk up and join in, or stand around with their hands in their pockets waiting to hear something interesting. But in wikispace, unless you provide a handle, you not only have no name -- you have no face. [[User:Xiong|— Xiongtalk]] 15:53, 15 Apr 2005 (CDT)


At first, I did create a mailing list for caucus; but that model is insufficiently open. A mailing list has an owner, with extraordinary power over the list. Also, each text is passed once only to all members, then forgotten -- texts cannot be edited.

I'm not "the boss" here; think of me as the guy who walked into the room first, turned on the lights, and set out the chairs. I have no control over the discussion.

The wiki model is not only far superior in general but I think it is clearly superior for the purpose of discussing Wikipedia-related issues. Using a wiki is like having a whiteboard in the room.

I'm not sure what you mean by my proposals. I have ideas, true, but this caucus is not here to push them. I have made several commonsense assertions; question them if you like:

1. The Wikipedian Community is in a state of crisis.

2. The community at large has reacted to this crisis with multiple calls for a general Convention. Given the technical nature of wikispace, the community is thus already in convention.

3. Draft charters are visible on many pages of Wikipediaspace.

4. The size of the general membership is so great that political models appropriate to large groups apply.

5. Political business is not transacted on the open floor of a convention. Viable proposals only come out of caucus -- or are railroaded through by a single powerful faction.

By the way, this is not the only caucus! Other Wikipedians are caucusing right now. I don't know where, and I don't know who -- but I guarantee there are many rooms in cyberspace in which the topic of a Charter or Constitution for the Wikipedian Community is in the air.

Much worse, established factions are planning to advance their positions without listening to any opposition. I would like to see something of strength arise to oppose the One-Thing People. [[User:Xiong|— Xiongtalk]] 16:14, 15 Apr 2005 (CDT)