Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia"

From Anarchopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edit of Semtex Revolver, changed back to last version by Libre)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
There are only two "explicit rules" here:
 
There are only two "explicit rules" here:
 
#Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist [[en:point of view|POVs]] are not welcome here.
 
#Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist [[en:point of view|POVs]] are not welcome here.
 +
This is because in an ideal society, Right-wing speech (ie. speech advocating, for instance, the use of force against tyrants, lower taxes, etc.), is banned.
 
#Anarchopedia does not have [[sysops]] (i.e. a power structure). All users have sysop permissions.
 
#Anarchopedia does not have [[sysops]] (i.e. a power structure). All users have sysop permissions.
 
+
Ignore, for a moment, the fact that on Wiki, by contrast, anyone can post, even non-users.  Also neglect the "protect" tab at the top of the page.
 
You can read some of the articles which intend to particulary describe '''Anarchopedia''':
 
You can read some of the articles which intend to particulary describe '''Anarchopedia''':
  

Revision as of 19:42, 17 March 2006

Anarchopedia Policies

  • Anarchopedia does not have an official policy.

There are only two "explicit rules" here:

  1. Right-wing, pro-state, and pro-capitalist are not welcome here.

This is because in an ideal society, Right-wing speech (ie. speech advocating, for instance, the use of force against tyrants, lower taxes, etc.), is banned.

  1. Anarchopedia does not have sysops (i.e. a power structure). All users have sysop permissions.

Ignore, for a moment, the fact that on Wiki, by contrast, anyone can post, even non-users. Also neglect the "protect" tab at the top of the page. You can read some of the articles which intend to particulary describe Anarchopedia: