Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia:en:what Anarchopedia is not"
From Anarchopedia
(moved from what Anarchopedia is not and my comment) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people which decide what is right and what is wrong. | **Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people which decide what is right and what is wrong. | ||
*''...'' | *''...'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Anarchopedia is not a leninist or bolchevic wiki. | ||
| + | -> then, all articles from bolchevics (and friends) are moved. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ... etc, ... | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about [[:deu:]] here. --[[User:Millosh|Milos Rancic]] 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:07, 2 May 2005
What Anarchopedia is not is the opposite of Anarchopedia:Itself. For those who consider that things are defined by negation, this list is quite important:
- Anarchopedia is not an authoritarian project.
- Anarchopedia doesn't have a.
- Anarchopedia doesn't have a small group of people which decide what is right and what is wrong.
- ...
- Anarchopedia is not a leninist or bolchevic wiki.
-> then, all articles from bolchevics (and friends) are moved.
... etc, ...
- I think that Anarchopedia should have texts about Marxists and Marxism. Of course, we should have more texts about anarchism and anarchists and Marxist texts should stay inside of part "close to anarchism". However, every community should make decision about it; i.e., I don't think that we should decide about deu: here. --Milos Rancic 09:07, 2 May 2005 (CDT)
