Difference between revisions of "Anarchopedia talk:1st General Meeting/thoughts by X"
From Anarchopedia
m |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The only part I have not understood is "protecting the database from justice", if a copyright violation is discovered it can be deleted, as it would happen on another wiki or even on a forum, there should never be any problems with justice. ~''[[User:Rev 22|Rev 22]]'' 16:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | The only part I have not understood is "protecting the database from justice", if a copyright violation is discovered it can be deleted, as it would happen on another wiki or even on a forum, there should never be any problems with justice. ~''[[User:Rev 22|Rev 22]]'' 16:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Protection means in example this http://www.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/111987.shtml --[[User:X|X]] 16:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 26 April 2006
Great points. I agree with it. I would add that the boundaries between languages should be put down and that we could do something about this. - Samarre
I too agree with X's position, wiki encyclopedia to me can be synonymous for "open knowledge-portal". "GFDL corpus" is a similar concept. Such a portal is a necessary tool for the coming peaceful anarchic/anarchist revolution.
The only part I have not understood is "protecting the database from justice", if a copyright violation is discovered it can be deleted, as it would happen on another wiki or even on a forum, there should never be any problems with justice. ~Rev 22 16:14, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Protection means in example this http://www.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/111987.shtml --X 16:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
